Skip to Content

Using Classification Limits To Deny Coverage In NY, Law360, by Michael Zigelman & Eric Stern

Posted Feb 16, 2016

By Michael L. Zigelman and Eric B. Stern

In a recent decision obtained by Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP’s global insurance litigation group – Black Bull Contracting, LLC v. Indian Harbor Ins. Co., 23 N.Y.S.3d 59 (1st Dept., 2016) – New York’s First Department held that the carrier in question – Indian Harbor Insurance Company – had no duty to defend or indemnify its Named Insured – Black Bull Contracting LLC – in an underlying bodily injury lawsuit, despite the fact that Indian Harbor issued its disclaimer in an arguably “untimely” manner pursuant to the strict disclaimer-timing rules of New York’s Insurance Law 3420(d).  In reaching their decision, the First Department found that the subject Policy’s “Classification Limitation” Endorsement was a condition precedent to coverage, and as such, did not operate as a waivable exclusion, therefore falling outside the scope of New York Insurance Law 3420(d)’s timing requirements.

This decision will have a significant impact on insurers relying on classification limitation endorsements as a basis to deny coverage, and further modifies the applicability of New York Insurance Law 3420(d).

Read more at the full article.

Awards & Honors

No aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Learn more about the selection methodology of awards and honors.

Mansfield Rule Certified 2023 Super Lawyers Super Lawyers Best Law Firms 2023 Best Law Firms 2024 Martindale Hubbel AV Preeminent Law 360