Skip to Content

Our thoughts are with the communities, families, and first responders and all those affected by the California wildfires.

Our thoughts are with the communities, families, and first responders and all those affected by the California wildfires.

Delaware Court Holds Excess Insurers May Not Rely on Exhaustion Clauses Absent Risk of ‘Actual Prejudice,’ Insurance Coverage Law Center

Posted Nov 3, 2020

Michael Zigelman, Co-Managing Partner of the New York City office and Chair of KD’s General Liability Coverage practice group, and Aaron Cargain, SF Of Counsel, had their article on the Delaware Court Pfizer decision published in Insurance Coverage Law Center on November 3, 2020.

The Delaware Superior Court recently held in Pfizer Inc. v. U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. that Pfizer Inc.’s (“Pfizer”) settlement with one of its insurers, for less than the policy limit, was not subject to an exhaustion clause in a policy issued by U.S. Specialty Insurance Co. (“U.S. Specialty”).

Read more (with subscription).

Our Firm's Awards & Honors

No aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Learn more about the selection methodology of awards and honors.

Mansfield Rule Certified 2023 Super Lawyers Best Law Firms 2025 Martindale Hubbel AV Preeminent Law 360